Home
Up

 

 

 

 

WEST HOUSTON ASSOCIATION

info@westhouston.org

820 Gessner Suite 1310

Houston, Texas 77024

v 713.461.9378

f 713.461.3065

West Houston Association Issues Brief

 


WHA Comments on 2025 RTP Plan--April 2004

 

The West Houston Association has reviewed the proposed 2025 Regional Transportation Plan and submits these comments for consideration by the Transportation Policy Council.

The West Houston Association has represented business and development interests in our 850 square mile area of interest in Houston’s western suburban communities since 1979. We focus on development and infrastructure to support quality growth. One of our primary areas of interest and expertise is transportation facilities and services. Our goal is to help assure our region has a transportation system that is a decided asset rather than a liability.

In summary, we believe the 2025 RTP:

• Adequately anticipates both the quantity and location of population and employment growth—it identifies the anticipated growth of employment centers such as Energy Corridor, Westchase and Memorial City
• Accurately depicts the needs of the entire eight county area served by this RTP
• Accurately identifies the change in peak-hour travel demand from a radial pattern to a circumvential pattern as employment continues to migrate to suburban locations
• Accommodates the resulting demand on the roadway and transit networks---particularly in the “unofficial” 100% Plan portion of the RTP and introduces new concepts such as “express streets” and “signature bus service”
• Acknowledges by including clean air initiatives the requirement to be in “conformity” with the State Implementation Plan to reduce emissions from mobile sources
• Provides for new technologies such as ITS, RCTSS; includes alternative modes such as bicycles and addresses requirements of freight movement on our system
• Recognizes individual agency initiatives and coordinates for synergistic impact
• Balances the need for new construction and the need for rehabilitation and maintenance and operations expenses
• Does not ignore the realities of current and future “market demands” for all modes of transportation
• Resists a “one-size-fits-all” approach to transportation planning and resists overemphasizing one life style choice over another

The West Houston Market Area Characterized by Rapid, Low-Density Residential Growth with High Concentrations of Employment
The West Houston area of interest consists of an estimated 2000 population of 1.16 million and is expected to reach 1.4 million by 2007. Our area’s 2000 employment of 388,000 is expected to reach over 600,000 by 2025. There are three major regional activity centers in the region: Westchase, Energy Corridor and Memorial City. Several of these are projected to reach concentrations of employment of 100,000 by 2025. Our area has over 49 million square feet of net rentable office space.

The character of this large, suburban area is clearly dominated by low-density single-family housing anchored by some of the region’s most successful master planned communities. Our region accounts for 34% of Metropolitan Houston new homes sold between 1990 and 2002 . Multi-family construction in our area accounted for 25% of that in Metropolitan Houston between 1998 and 2002.

The resulting demands on our current and future transportation system reflect the reality of low-density residential, dispersed retail and growing suburban employment concentrations.

Transportation System Needs
The West Houston area work and non-work trip requirements are heavily oriented to the single driver vehicles—similar to that of the region as whole and other modern, fast-growing metropolitan areas across the country.

RTP Adequately Addresses Regional Needs
Our eight county region is required to produce a 20-year transportation plan every three years. This three-year cycle is designed to assure that the plan is always up to date with expected growth and changes in the eight county area. The current plan, the 2025 Regional Transportation Plan is a compendium of plans from agencies across this eight county area as complied by the Transportation Policy Council. All agencies submit their project plans to the Houston Galveston Area Council (HGAC) to be compiled and analyzed as a complete system of transportation projects and services for the public. In the Houston-Galveston non-attainment area, our plan must meet strict federal air emission requirements. HGAC performs extensive modeling on the compiled plan to assure that it “conforms” to the emission requirements as established in our State Implementation Plan.

RTP Anticipates Growth and Transportation Demand
We have found that the RTP identifies expected population growth and employment in the entire eight county region. Further, through empirical data and extensive modeling, HGAC accurately reflects the nature of that growth—where population and employment have grown and in what proportions. The RTP anticipates, we believe accurately, that regional employment will continue to disperse to the suburban areas while the CBD and inner loop areas also grow.

The Houston region is in reality a highly suburbanized region with pockets of high density. The transportation system plan must and, in this case does, accurately reflect these realities if it is going to be effective and cost beneficial.

In modeling the peak hour travel demand that will result from these trends, HGAC concludes that the predominant trip demands will shift from the current radial pattern to a more circumvential pattern particularly in the fast growing west and northwest suburban areas. If this trend was not acknowledged and adequately planned for, the RTP would be fatally flawed. This 2025 RTP is not flawed.

Roadway Deficiencies Measured
A vital component of the RTP is its measure of the current deficiencies in roadway capacities. Without this knowledge accurate plans for capacity improvements, intersection redesign, signal timing, and the application of transit services would be impossible to plan for and implement intelligently. Previously mentioned demand is all important in this process. Again the modeling undertaken in the 2025 RTP process is critical to this as is an understanding of existing conditions. On both counts, we believe the 2025 RTP performs well.

The 2025 RTP also accurately measures the need for system maintenance and rehabilitation. All to often, these necessary elements of a transportation system are the “step child”. This plan accurately estimates what is needed to maintain the system during each elements useful life and what the reconstruction costs are at the end of that useful life. These are important issues and can not be dismissed.

Financial Modeling & 100% Plan
The West Houston Association believes that the RTP can be most useful when the demand data—population and employment growth—is overlaid on the current system and the system is, in essence, redefined to fully accommodate that demand within acceptable parameters. In our judgment, this is not fully possible in the 2025 RTP. Federal regulations require an artificial financial restraint in the planning process. That is, the 2025 RTP may not show what projects—roadway and transit—are needed to fully address the demand we actually foresee. The official RTP must conclude therefore that sufficient financial resources will not be devoted to building and maintaining the full system needed. It must be “financially constrained”.

In our view, the financial restraint requirement will automatically lead to a dysfunctional, under performing system that will be the equivalent of an economic ball and chain around the feet of the Houston economy. As an example, we may likely see much more user-toll financed construction than is anticipated in the Plan. To the extent we do, the financial constraints could not foresee the freeing of traditional funding resources to accomplish more and different projects than those currently in the plan.

Our community has embraced user-toll financing for roadways as valid and economically sound means of paying for increased capacity. Roadways may be fully or partially “self-financed”. It is more difficult on a 20-year planning horizon to estimate what roadways may be subject to this alternative funding vehicle. Additional future roadway projects may be partially financed using this method thus expanding the financial capabilities of area agencies.

Fortunately, the 2025 RTP carries an unofficial addendum, the 100% Plan (the Plan) that seeks to define the total system needs. In its current form, the 100% is an excellent first start. It must be continued and refined. It can serve the public well as a barometer of how the transportation system will perform in the future against the demand that will be placed on it.

As an example, the 100% Plan carries a new component of the roadway network, Express Streets. It is acknowledged that our current thoroughfare system is undersized and that the freeway system is disproportionately over used for trips that would be better served on a street. The Express Street concept is valid and well discussed in the Plan as an alternative to freeway use. Despite this, implementing the full system is problematic. Right of way restrictions, access requirements for property and land use are only a few of the matters that will serve to limit the ability of agencies to develop a complete Express Street network. This early planning however provides the opportunity to identify the those corridors that may more easily accommodate them. The West Houston Association supports further concept development of grade separated express streets on SH 6, Westheimer Parkway-Westheimer Road, Bellaire Blvd. and Gessner. Several of these routes present major obstacles as mentioned above.

Regional Transit Services
The 2025 RTP reflects the planning of the Metropolitan Transit Authority and the Metro Solution plan as passed by the voters. In so doing, it reflects the limitations of providing upgraded transit services to regional activity centers outside the inner loop. Our concern is that limited roadway capacity will require the long-range development of alternatives such as transit that better serves the rapidly growing and low-density suburban environment.

We are not certain when demand for transit services to accommodate suburban-home-to-suburban work-trips will be materially relevant and financially feasible. We do know, however, that current transit services to these suburban activity centers are minimal and efforts must start now to plan for this future demand.

 

Comments on Development of RTP 2025 Plan

West Houston Association, Roger H. Hord, President

November 8, 2001


Over the next 20 years our region will add another 2 million residents to slightly exceed a population of 6 million by 2025. Employment will exceed 3 million by 2025. Of the region’s infrastructure needs, transportation stands out as the most important element in accommodating that growth—to assure acceptable levels of mobility for people and goods. Of the many choices we face about that growth, we have no choice but to accommodate its demand for mobility but we may choose to accommodate it well or poorly.

We believe we can and will choose wisely—we will choose to:

  • Add capacity in both roadways and transit

  • Improve maintenance and rehabilitation of the systems

  • Enhance traffic flow systems

  • Work remotely—reducing some trips

We believe profound, long-term regional development patterns have inexorably changed the lives and work of every Houstonian in the area. There is no indication this pattern of growth will change in the future. The 2 million new residents will deploy themselves in much the same pattern as they have historically. We believe the following are necessary elements of a regional transportation policy and would to offer them for your consideration in the 2025 Plan as appropriate:

 

Undertake Analysis of Regional Activity Center Transportation Needs

 

Houston may have as many as 5 regional employment/activity centers employing 100,000 or more by the year 2025 with 5 additional centers in the 60,000 to 100,000 range. Each will have significant congestion problems that we are not now prepared to address. To position our system to address these problems we need to first rid ourselves of the traditional "radial commute centered on the CBD" paradigm. Commutes are not just "in" in the morning and "out" in the evening.

 

To our knowledge, our community does not have a comprehensive analysis of the collective transportation needs of the regional activity centers. We envision a coordinated, in-depth evaluation of the current and future transit service fully integrated into roadway transportation improvements for the major regional activity centers as a first step in crafting and implementing an effective regional transportation policy.

 

Arterial System Expansion

 

In order to complement our expanding freeway system we believe it is imperative that arterial system development be accelerated. These items could be considered:

  • Expand funding allocated to arterial system development

  • Designate a new class of arterial system above the current major thoroughfare—"the super street"—which would have some characteristics of a freeway such as more limited access and turning movements and channelized grade separations and enhanced traffic signalization systems. Previous studies have suggested a 4 to 5 mile spacing in radial and circumferential patterns.

  • Accelerate regional traffic signal system deployment.

Freeway/Tollway Joint Development

 

As currently proposed for Interstate 10 West, we believe joint toll and freeway development will speed ROW acquisition, utility relocation and construction. This should also serve as a means of accelerating financing of major facilities. Possible projects would be US 290 redevelopment, I-10 East, and expansions of freeways outside Harris County.

 

Transit System Development

 

Future transit system development should recognize several key facts: 1) suburbanization of the population is continuing 2) job dispersion is continuing with regional activity centers gaining concentrations. With this understanding we submit the following thoughts:

  • Refine the HOV system to serve regional activity centers—physical connections—dual direction, ramp access-- and direct service to the centers from surrounding residential communities

  • Revise policies that work against developing new transit markets from residential areas to the regional activity centers

  • To extent rail can contribute to redevelopment of the "urban core", confine rail system development to our more density developed area—inside Loop 610 and implement at-grade, mixed flow light rail focused on CBD.