|






WEST HOUSTON ASSOCIATION
info@westhouston.org
820 Gessner Suite 1310
Houston, Texas 77024
v 713.461.9378
f 713.461.3065
| |
West Houston Association Issues Brief
Transportation/Transit
|
WHA Board of Directors Addresses METRO's University Rail
Alignment in July, 2006 Letter to Congressman Culberson.
"The Board of Directors of the West Houston Association has
a history of interest and involvement in the planning and support for
transportation projects that impact the West Houston Region. Therefore, we
have considered the recent proposals by METRO for light rail in the
University Corridor. While the line that is the subject of the current
debate is not within our sphere of interest, we are confident the outcome
of this matter will dictate whether or not West Houston will, in the
future, have a another major transit line extending into the western
suburbs of the West Houston Region, supplementing the I-10 High Occupancy
Transit Lanes (HOT).
The Board believes that the most financially competitive, technically
competent alignment that maximizes ridership potential will best serve the
greater Houston community and should be chosen by METRO. The needs of the
overall community should come before the desires and interests of a small
group of residents and businesses. While their interests should be
considered, these individual interests must not dictate progress for the
community as a whole.
Recent history informs us that to provide greater mobility for the largest
number of people, some will unfortunately not be pleased with the
solution. In the short term, a few most affected by a particular decision
will find progress for the overall community will not be in alignment with
their individual desires. However, that does not, and should not, mean
that we cannot have progress if that project meets or exceeds our
collective demands for mobility, efficiency and quality, and the greater
good is served.
Examples of the greater good being served are found in practically every
major public infrastructure project— Interstate 10 reconstruction, Bayport
Terminal, and Intercontinental Airport expansion are recent examples. As
you know so well, in each case every effort was made to minimize negative
impacts, however there were those in close proximity to these projects who
were and remain opposed, no matter the rationale. Our region is going to
grow by 4,000,000 persons over the next 30 years with the majority of them
locating in the western half of the region. We will face these problems
repeatedly, but in the end, those charged with leadership must make the
decision that is the right decision for the region.
The future of an efficient transportation system in West Houston must
involve transit as well as a full complement of freeways, tollways and
major thoroughfares. To meet this goal, we believe the long-term future of
West Houston is best served if we preserve the option for transit in the
Richmond/Westpark Corridor west to northern Fort Bend County. Choosing a
less than optimum alignment in the existing University line may not only
foreclose a future link to West Houston, it may well jeopardize funding
for the entire University line.
We appreciate your leadership on mobility issues and particularly on the
Interstate 10 project. We believe difficult bold decisions and leadership
can and will continue to make a difference as the Houston region plans and
implements future mobility projects."
|
|
February, 2002
|
Toward a Rational
Transit Policy That Serves the Region & Regional Activity Centers |
We believe profound, long-term regional development
patterns have inexorably changed the lives and work of every
Houstonian in the area. There is no indication this pattern of growth
will change in the future. We believe these continuing changes, which
underscore both the preference for suburban life and work styles and
the opportunity for new-style urban living, require a fundamental
change in thinking and planning for transit services. Traditional
transit service paradigms predicated on a single central employment
center must give way to new, more efficient strategies if transit is
to fulfill a useful, truly productive role in the future of this city.
Our region is at a crossroads where is demanded the most creative
thinking possible. The West Houston Association, therefore, urges very
careful and thoughtful consideration of future transit service
development.
According to HGAC population and employment
projections, over the next 20 years our region will add another 2
million residents to slightly exceed a population of 6 million by
2025. Employment will exceed 3 million by 2025. And underscoring the
magnitude of our regional development, Houston is projected to have as
many as 5 regional employment/activity centers employing 100,000 or
more by the year 2025 with 5 additional centers in the 60,000 to
100,000 range.
We believe the following are necessary elements of
a rational regional transit policy:
Undertake a Regional Activity Centers Transportation Plan
We call for a Regional Activity Centers
Transportation Plan, a coordinated, in-depth evaluation of the current
and future transit service fully integrated into roadway
transportation improvements for the major regional employment/activity
centers as a first step in crafting and implementing an effective
regional transportation policy.
Achieve Transit Service Centered on Regional Activity Centers
The growth of population and employment in the
suburban areas of our community is a long established trend and data
indicate it will continue over the next 25 years. We believe the real
challenge Metro faces is not how to implement rail in the 15 to 25
mile long radial corridors focused on the Central Business District,
as it seems the current Metro 2025 plan contemplates, but how to best
serve the work trips centered on the growing number of major suburban
activity centers throughout the region.
Refine HOV System to Serve Regional Activity Centers
Houston has invested heavily in an extensive and
highly successful high occupancy vehicle (HOV) system on our radial
freeways. They have proven to be a highly effective and cost efficient
means of meeting the challenges of a growing and diverse metropolitan
area. As we stated in previous policy, we believe conversion of
barrier separated HOV lanes to diamond lanes will improve access
during non-peak travel hours and certainly has the potential for safer
operations. We believe it is rational and economically sound to allow
these facilities to "mature" as transit and carpool facilities and
redesign them and the related transit services to directly serve the
suburban activity centers as well as central business district. Dual
direction HOVs, ramp access and direct express bus services to these
areas should be implemented. Policies which hinder or prohibit
development of new transit services in lower density areas should be
rethought
No Delay for I-10, I-610 and US 290
As improving mobility in heavily traveled corridors
such as Interstate 10 West and Loop 610 West are priorities, design
and construction on planned freeway improvements should not be delayed
in any fashion while Metro’s 2025 Plan or the Suburban Centers Plan is
developed. US 290 redevelopment to accommodate growth must be
advanced. The aggressive development and completion of these projects
is paramount.
Confine Rail Transit in Metro’s 2025 Plan to Region’s "Urban Core"
We believe the role for rail in the Metro’s 2025
Plan intermediate-term future is currently being forged by the current
Main Street Line—at grade, in mixed flow traffic, in more densely
developed areas. Because proposed ridership is low, it has modest if
any congestion and air quality benefits. The current line and any
future extensions in our view should recognize rail’s limitations and
focus on its roll as a support to the revitalization of Houston’s
urban core and central business district. This seems a sensible and
prudent approach that should continue to guide rail’s development in
Houston.
The system proposed can not be so expensive to
build and operate that it drains resources needed to plan, development
and implement transit services to suburban activity centers. We
believe Metro’s 2025 Transit System Plan should acknowledge these
elements and incorporate them into a more rationale transit plan for
the region.
West Houston Association Supports Travel Rate Improvement Program
(TRIP 2000) for the Houston Area
We endorse the Greater Houston Partnership's
coordinated, multi-agency transportation plan, TRIP 2000 as an outline
and first step for the region’s efforts to implement effective
transportation systems to help improve mobility. We commit our aid in
helping achieve enhanced funding and to find new ways of building
smarter to improve transportation systems.
By Resolution of the West Houston Association Board
of Directors, January 16, 2002 |
| |
| |
Metro Mobility 2025
| The
Metropolitan Transit Authority
is undertaking an evaluation of several corridors to determine the nature of
transit facilities that should be appropriately employed in the future. The
following map depicts those corridors and what is currently under
consideration in each:
 |
|