|
Subcommittee Name & Area |
Recommendation |
Status |
Next Steps |
|
Suburban--Mixed Use Areas |
Create a Mixed Use Area (MUA) designation that will foster
mixed use, high density development that reduces auto-dependency and
create a high-quality, pedestrian-friendly transit-supportive environment |
Draft Concept Developed
Draft
regulatory requirements developed
Investigate Sugarland TownCenter |
Establish MUA working group to refine concept and draft
ordinance Private sector funding for position to
help one PD staff position |
|
Suburban--Courtyards |
Establish working group to examine potential performance
standards to encourage use of courtyards as a means of creating more
pedestrian friendly communities |
Draft concept and performance standards developed
- How do you ensure the greenspace is maintained--fund
set aside to cover O&M
- Public safety for police and fire is a concern
|
Establishes working group to refine concept and performance
standards |
|
Suburban-Amenities |
Adopt point system for calculating the proportion of
required detention that can also satisfy required compensating open space |
Draft concept developed including proposed point system |
PD test the concept and report back to committee
Draft guidelines |
|
Suburban--Reserves |
Revise requirements for creating reserves and promulgate
those requirements clearly in
Chapter 42 Code of Ordinances
|
Draft reserves matrix created; modifications to reserves
proposed |
Legal Department prepares amendment to Chapter 42
PD presents draft ordinance to Planning Commission and
Council |
|
Development Impacts--Financing Infrastructure Improvements |
Recommend a combination of builder impact fees and a city
sponsored financing entity |
Concept plan drafted:
- PD & Public Works (PWE) identify zones and assess
existing infrastructure in and around the zone.
- PWE prepares plan for upgrading the infrastructure to
meet needs of new development.
- Infrastructure financing and implementation plan
would be created that incorporates builder impact fee and some
commitment from COH to match revenues from fee for project meeting
certain criteria.
|
PWE and PD identify areas |
|
Development Impacts--Drainage Impacts |
Amend Chapter 9 of the Infrastructure Design Manual to
address single family parcels currently excluded from the detention
requirements and require detention at a rate of 0.5 acre-feet per acre of
increased impervious area for tracts being subdivided in less than an acre
Develop sub-regional detention facilities that would
mitigate storm water runoff impact of development within the neighborhoods
where it is occurring. |
Proposed amendments drafted
Need
additional study to identify 2 or 3 candidate projects within 9 months |
PWE to identify candidate projects |
|
Development Impacts--Public Notification-Platting |
Improve public notification by including original plat
names for each replat application on the Subdivision Plat Summary Report
and further expand e-mail notification to neighborhoods |
PD revised Subdivision Plat Summary (SDS) Report to include
the original subdivision plat names on replats and created SDS E-Report
and notified super-neighborhoods & civic clubs
Developed flyer for civic clubs |
Completed |
|
Neighborhood Preservation--Prevailing Building
Line/Prevailing Lot Size PVLS |
Lower the threshold of qualifying lots from 75% to
somewhere between 51% and 60% to allow more older neighborhoods to remain
intact Change basis of calculation on PVLS to area
rather than number or lots
Forward technical amends to the Legal Department to
draft ordinance amendments
Allow neighborhoods to preserve the existing lot sizes,
regardless of whether a prevailing size exists by calculating character on
area. |
Propose calculations prepared
PD proposed amendments sent to Legal for review
|
Convene working group to review proposed amendments to the
PVLS--Get input from GHBA--PD to work with Legal |
|
Neighborhood Preservation--Neighborhood Character |
Define a menu of options (lot coverage, height, side
setbacks, garage location) for preserving character across an entire
neighborhood or lesser portion. Criteria and process will
mirror PVBL and PLS |
Draft matrix developed |
Establish working group to further define the elements of
neighborhood character and propose criteria for preserving such character.
PD will work with committee & Legal on drafting ordinance |
|
Neighborhood Preservation--Performance Standards |
Planning Commission should conduct a thorough testing of
possible scenarios follwoing a two pronged approach:
- Prevent businesses from locating on streets in areas
that are predominately SFR
- Study the effect of mitigation where predominantly
SFR is adjacent to commercial development along streets
|
|
Reconvene joint committee working group and invite
additional neighborhood reps to further refine concept |
|
Long Range Planning |
Issue: Houston no longer relies on growth by
annexation. This change in Houston's growth model places greater
emphasis on Houston's need to compete with other metropolitan areas for
the attraction of new economic development opportunities. The
success of economic growth is increasingly dependent on the quality of
life offered by the city. The city needs a strategic plan
which defines its current condition and identifies opportunities and
threats for its future. |
|
Long Range Planning--Strategic Planning |
Commit to the development of a Strategic plan that address
the symbiotic relationship between economic growth and quality of life.
Such a plan should define the current condition and identify opportunities
and threats for the future |
Committee developed draft revisions to
Chapter 33 of
the Code of Ordinances enabling comprehensive planning in Houston. |
Reconstitute a committee that develops strategic goals for
development in the city: Housing; Industry-suggest industry location and
capacity to serve the industries that the city seeks to attract; encourage
growth yet balance quality of life Develop housing
gap analysis (demand generator) |
|
Long Range Planning--Focus on Mobility |
Mobility planning needs to be part of the economic growth
strategy to promote growth of property values and sales tax bases while
serving the needs of the community in housing and services |
|
Establish new, long-term focus on planning, agency
coordination, scheduling and identification and securing funding
opportunities through a transportation liaison in PD--PD to hire person
|
|
Long Range Planning--Focus on Drainage |
The city should have a dedicated focus on drainage and
flooding with attention to the coordination of improvements with HCFCD and
other agencies. This should include the identification and securing
of leveraged funding opportunities and develop an understanding of the
requirements of the mandated storm water quality programs and their
impacts on the drainage system. |
|
Develop a policy with input from Planning Commission, PWE
and private sector--topics to be included:
- sub-regional detention
- impervious cover
- neighborhood drainage
- funding sources
|
|
Long Range Planning--Comprehensive GIS |
Develop a geographic information system (GIS) that is
coordinated with the data provided by others to identify quality of life
and economic growth opportunities |
Mayor's Geo Spatial Committee is meeting to develop a
seamless approach using common architecture. Recently hired city GIS
staff to assist with this effort--start date March 27 |
Utilize updated GIS to conduct gap analysis and identify
and foster strategic growth. Recognize that the
GIS is a marketing and informational tool |
|
Long Range Planning--Capital Improvement Plan |
The CIP is a manifestation of the strategic plan. Its
projects should largely serve the strategic goals. The city should
consider adopting a ten year view of the CIP with two components:
- long range programmatic improvements (representing
the bulk of the CIP) and
- Shorter term responsiveness to citizen calls for
action
|
Revisions to Super Neighborhood Program requires
neighborhoods to identify short term CIP items |
Create 10 year CIP (5 years funded) based upon 10 year
project plan |
|
Urban Core--Transit Corridor Plans |
Issue: There are no rules or standards to respond to
the needs of development along the transit corridors (setbacks, pedestrian
access and parking) The Planning Commission considers parking and setback
variances without any framework. |
|
Urban Core--Transit Corridor Plans |
Planning Commission convene a working group composed of all
stakeholders to develop a pilot plan by May 2006 centered on Main Street
Corridor light rail stations with recommended rules reflecting the
different corridor segments |
Transit Corridor Plan concept drafted |
Establishes working group to define scope of pilot plan,
evaluate plan and develops implementation plan |
|
Urban Core--Right of Way Dedication |
Issue: As development occurs, the PC is regularly
asked to grant variances not to dedicate ROW on existing streets. In
many cases the pavement is very narrow, there is open ditch drainage and
homes setback only 10' from the ROW. The result is a patchwork of
ROW dedication. |
|
Urban Core--Right of Way Dedication |
Planning Commission should further define the street
hierarchy classification system to include local streets
Analyzed performance standards for local streets in
specific areas in terms of ROW and Paving |
|
Reconvene subcommittee to define criteria for hierarchy and
develop performance standards for specific areas
Move to Neighborhood Preservation |
|
Urban Core--Additional Considerations |
Reconvene Urban Core to consider
- Routine variances
- Delineating recommendations that stimulate the
development of affordable housing
- remainder tracts
- standards to stimulate pedestrian friendly
development
- Establish coordination practices with PWE
- Encourage planning of green space
- Establish flexible standards for central city
commercial opportunities
- Parking for infill development
|
|
Planning Commission reconvenes subcommittee to work on
routine variances. |
|
Parking--Texas Medical Center |
Issue: Continued growth in the Medical Center area
and the need for structured parking is straining capacity of the area's
roadway system. The combination of TMC's location along Main and
Fannin Streets and the increasing development with in the Medical Center
are resulting in daily gridlock on streets. |
|
Parking--Texas Medical Center |
- Expand TMC parking management area (PMA) to include
new properties and require traffic studies for proposed development
location in congested areas
- Establish a max. parking ration or ceiling for
congested areas within the TMC PMA
- Encourage partnerships with City, County, Metro to
build remote structured parking facilities at strategic locations along
Main Street light rail line
|
|
PD parking management office and TMC establish new
boundaries and amend PMA PD parking management and
TMC explore concept of parking rations or ceilings. If feasible,
proposed amendment to PMA to require ratios as requested by TMC |
|
Parking--Decal Program |
Notification of decal parking application should be mailed
to both owners and tenants of properties within 200 feet of the proposed
decal parking area Special events permits should
be given to residents upon request
Contractor/builder permits should be made available |
Ordinance amended 10/2005 to require notification
Special events permits are available to residents upon
request
Permits are available upon request |
All Completed |
|
Parking--Guest Parking |
Issue: As density increase in urban and suburban
areas, on-street and off-street guest parking becomes scarce. This
condition is often exacerbated when infrastructure in older neighborhoods
is not adequate. Chapter 42 does not require guest parking for
residential infill. |
|
Parking--Guest Parking |
- Establish incentives for providing guest parking
- Encourage single entry driveways to preserve
on-street parking
- Encourage shared driveway entrances
- Re-institute paving assessment program to replace
open ditch with curb and gutter
- Anticipate the need for neighborhood parking lots
- Development impact subcommittee drafted concept to
spread cost of infrastructure improvements
|
|
- Establish working group to further consider guest
parking
- If consensus reached, PD presents proposal to PC
- Amend Chap 42 to require quest parking for large
scale development
|
|
Parking on Transit/Commercial Corridors |
Issue: Retail and mixed use projects proposed in the
Main Street Corridor have requested reduced parking based on the proximity
to light rail stations. There is little data available to
substantiate arguments in favor of granting variance for reduced parking.
There is concern that overflow parking will spill onto adjacent properties
and the possibility of establishing a retail environment that is certain
to fail. |
|
Parking on Transit/Commercial Corridors |
PC should study establishing parking grids based on
need. Some areas may have a ceiling and some areas may have
alternative parking ratios |
|
Public/Private partnerships to develop parking structures
at strategic locations along rail look at highly
dense corridors with residential and commercial development
develop parking rations for development near LRT and BRT |