Home
Up

 

 

 

 

WEST HOUSTON ASSOCIATION

info@westhouston.org

820 Gessner Suite 190

Houston, Texas 77024

v 713.461.9378

f 713.461.3065

West Houston Association Issues


Planning & Development

 

Additional Issues: 

 

City of Houston Delaying Emergency Traffic Impact Analysis and Mitigation/High Density Development Ordinance


Indications are that the ordinance proposed late last year to target high-rise development in the Houston City is being delayed to give those working with the administration an opportunity to determine the best way to deal with projects that are deemed to adversely impact residential areas even after complying with all existing city ordinances.  Last year's ordinance was to have be voted on in January, 2008.   A Stakeholders committee began working with the City Public Works and Planning Departments to revise the original ordinance draft.

 

Read material developed by the Stakeholders committee at this link (external link)

 

Working with the administration to foster an atmosphere that remains conducive to development is Houstonians for Responsible Growth (external link).

 

ORIGINAL PROPOSAL: The amendment to Chapter 45 of the Code of Ordinances with an emergency provision to require high-rise residential developments of 100 units or more within the City to undertake a traffic analysis and requires the Director of Public Works to ask for mitigation of any negative impact. 

 

 Read the original draft ordinance as presented to Council on October 30 at this link. (PDF)

 

 

Urban Corridor Planning-Draft Report to Mandate Development Standards in Transit Corridors


The City of Houston in June 2006 launched the Urban Corridor Planning process to "change how the City regulates development and designs its streets and other infrastructure in order to create a high quality urban environment in areas along METRO's light rail and guided rapid transit corridors".  Summaries of the process and status can be seen at this link: Urban Corridor Planning Houston.  Information on the September 2007 planning report on Phase II and III can be found at this link: Urban Corridor Planning.

 

The corridors being evaluated are noted on the map on this page.  The process generally promotes "transit oriented development" (TOD) to maximize transit ridership potential in these corridors by increasing density of development, in human scale and designed to be pedestrian-friendly and transit supportive."

 

To accomplish these goals the report appears to be producing an ordinance prescriptive in approach to development adjacent to transit streets.

 

The current report identifies observations and obstacles to achieving the urban corridor plan.  Following are excerpts from the plan.

 

Observations:

  • Observers stress a continuation of suburban sprawl as the only lifestyle choice is neither sustainable nor financially viable.  There must be a more balanced approach where attractive lifestyle alternatives are provided within the urban center of the City, and that this urban lifestyle must be supported by urban amenities, including high order transit.

  • Market forces, as well as current fiscal and planning policy, frustrate the required change to the planned urban structure....current practices of the City seem to prevent the successful development of TODs and consequently, the evolution of the existing urban structure have been slow.

  • There have been some success stories where locations are slowly developing into more "urban districts."

  • Success in changing urban structure is generally a result of combining tools (planning, financial, etc.) with circumstances.  Typically, government intervention beyond new transit is seen as a key redevelopment catalyst that can influence private sector investment decisions.

  • Financial incentives provided by the City may require that the broader population pay a higher proportion of the cost of development.  In fact, this shifting of costs may better reflect the unmeasured real costs of development.  There are costs and benefits in all of the City's implementation activities.  In a jurisdiction such as Houston where there is relatively little direct governmental development costs, this inequity may prove difficult to balance.

  • Implementation costs are typically offset by qualitative and quantitative benefits of TODs.  Faster implementation of a new urban structure requires a focused effort, political will and a complementary package of planning policy, building programs and financial tools.

  • Changing established urban structure takes time and will occur incrementally.  TODs can provide much greater choices for transportation, living and working over time.

  • Improvement initiatives must be supported by the City and other public agencies and must be developed in concert with private sector investment.

Obstacles:

  • Transit Oriented Development is not a form of building that is specifically permitted by the City's planning framework.  As a result, developers must achieve this "desirable form of development" through the "costly, risky and time consuming variance process."  The City lacks a comprehensive plan review process and as a result gives mixed messages, has competing interests and differing objectives.  This works against achieving TODs in comparison to suburban development.  Uncertainty and the length of approval process establish TODs as a very risky endeavor.

  • The cost of development generally exceeds the achievable rent/price for all but a niche market.  The fiscal gap must be overcome...if the private sector can ever be expected to deliver TODs.  In the East Corridor TODs per unit cost is $100,000 per unit higher than achievable market prices.

  • The primary market for TODs is "dual income, no kids" with an income of $250,000+."   However this market is "too small to facilitate TODs along the 25 to 30 miles of planned transit line."  To expand "attractiveness," a reduction in the unit costs to something more affordable to the local neighborhood residents.  "And requires a public school system that supports new development catering to families."

Summary of tools recommended to achieve TODs available at this link (PDF)

Costs and Benefits of proposal-The report admits the need for a "complex combination of tools."  It suggests a cost benefit study to determine who benefits and who should bear the costs noting that "externalities of urban sprawl and the benefits of compact urban form are not always fully measured...suggesting that some of the redistribution of costs might be validated if these externalities were properly assessed."  This recommendation from the report is available at this link (PDF)

The Reports 17 recommendations are available at this link (PDF)

 

City of Houston Dumpster Screening Ordinance in Effect--Report Violations to 311.


The City of Houston dumpster screening ordinance is effective October 22, 2007.  Click here for a copy of the ordinance. (PDF) The ordinance (2207-615) requires:

  • An owner or lessee of a property shall place or maintain a bulk container so that it is not visible from the street right-or-way (ROW) on the address side of the property.  A bulk container located on a service drive behind a building on said property shall not be deemed visible from the street ROW.

  • A bulk container shall be deemed visible only if it can be seen by a person who is standing at grade level on any part of the ROW of public street having a ROW width of 40 feet or more that adjoins the address side of the property on which the bulk container is located.

  • An owner or lessee of property may utilize a berm, building, fence, wall, gate, shrubbery, or a combination thereof, to accomplish the screening of a bulk container from view.


 

 

2006 General Plan Report

The City of Houston Planning Commission proposed to City Council that plans for mobility and drainage be the focus of a "general planning" process as the top priorities that directly impact the growth of the City's tax base.  The Mobility and Drainage Plans should be coordinated now and over time as each affects the other.  Click here to read a copy of the General Plan Committee Report dated December 8, 2006.

 


The City of Houston Planning Commission has received first reports of recommendations from subcommittees.  The subcommittees will continue their work after a reorganization of responsibilities identified at a Commission meeting in June 2006

Following is a summary of the subcommittee reports and the alignment of subcommittee as of June 2006.

 

Subcommittee Name & Area Recommendation Status Next Steps
Suburban--Mixed Use Areas Create a Mixed Use Area (MUA) designation that will foster mixed use, high density development that reduces auto-dependency and create a high-quality, pedestrian-friendly transit-supportive environment Draft Concept Developed

Draft regulatory requirements developed

Investigate Sugarland TownCenter

Establish MUA working group to refine concept and draft ordinance

Private sector funding for position to help one PD staff position

Suburban--Courtyards Establish working group to examine potential performance standards to encourage use of courtyards as a means of creating more pedestrian friendly communities Draft concept and performance standards developed
  • How do you ensure the greenspace is maintained--fund set aside to cover O&M
  • Public safety for police and fire is a concern
Establishes working group to refine concept and performance standards
Suburban-Amenities Adopt point system for calculating the proportion of required detention that can also satisfy required compensating open space Draft concept developed including proposed point system PD test the concept and report back to committee

Draft guidelines

Suburban--Reserves Revise requirements for creating reserves and promulgate those requirements clearly in Chapter 42 Code of Ordinances

 

Draft reserves matrix created; modifications to reserves proposed Legal Department prepares amendment to Chapter 42

PD presents draft ordinance to Planning Commission and Council

Development Impacts--Financing Infrastructure Improvements Recommend a combination of builder impact fees and a city sponsored financing entity Concept plan drafted:
  • PD & Public Works (PWE) identify zones and assess existing infrastructure in and around the zone.
  • PWE prepares plan for upgrading the infrastructure to meet needs of new development.
  • Infrastructure financing and implementation plan would be created that incorporates builder impact fee and some commitment from COH to match revenues from fee for project meeting certain criteria.
PWE and PD identify areas
Development Impacts--Drainage Impacts Amend Chapter 9 of the Infrastructure Design Manual to address single family parcels currently excluded from the detention requirements and require detention at a rate of 0.5 acre-feet per acre of increased impervious area for tracts being subdivided in less than an acre

Develop sub-regional detention facilities that would mitigate storm water runoff impact of development within the neighborhoods where it is occurring.

Proposed amendments drafted

Need additional study to identify 2 or 3 candidate projects within 9 months

 

PWE to identify candidate projects

Development Impacts--Public Notification-Platting Improve public notification by including original plat names for each replat application on the Subdivision Plat Summary Report and further expand e-mail notification to neighborhoods PD revised Subdivision Plat Summary (SDS) Report to include the original subdivision plat names on replats and created SDS E-Report and notified super-neighborhoods & civic clubs

Developed flyer for civic clubs

Completed
Neighborhood Preservation--Prevailing Building Line/Prevailing Lot Size PVLS Lower the threshold of qualifying lots from 75% to somewhere between 51% and 60% to allow more older neighborhoods to remain intact

Change basis of calculation on PVLS to area rather than number or lots

Forward technical amends to the Legal Department to draft ordinance amendments

Allow neighborhoods to preserve the existing lot sizes, regardless of whether a prevailing size exists by calculating character on area.

Propose calculations prepared

 

 

PD proposed amendments sent to Legal for review

 

 

Convene working group to review proposed amendments to the PVLS--Get input from GHBA--PD to work with Legal
Neighborhood Preservation--Neighborhood Character Define a menu of options (lot coverage, height, side setbacks, garage location) for preserving character across an entire neighborhood or lesser portion.  Criteria and process  will mirror PVBL and PLS Draft matrix developed Establish working group to further define the elements of neighborhood character and propose criteria for preserving such character.  PD will work with committee & Legal on drafting ordinance
Neighborhood Preservation--Performance Standards Planning Commission should conduct a thorough testing of possible scenarios follwoing a two pronged approach:
  • Prevent businesses from locating on streets in areas that are predominately SFR
  • Study the effect of mitigation where predominantly SFR is adjacent to commercial development along streets
  Reconvene joint committee working group and invite additional neighborhood reps to further refine concept
Long Range Planning Issue: Houston no longer relies on growth by annexation.  This change in Houston's growth model places greater emphasis on Houston's need to compete with other metropolitan areas for the attraction of new economic development opportunities.  The success of economic growth is increasingly dependent on the quality of life offered by the city.   The city needs a strategic plan which defines its current condition and identifies opportunities and threats for its future.
Long Range Planning--Strategic Planning Commit to the development of a Strategic plan that address the symbiotic relationship between economic growth and quality of life.  Such a plan should define the current condition and identify opportunities and threats for the future Committee developed draft revisions to Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances enabling comprehensive planning in Houston. Reconstitute a committee that develops strategic goals for development in the city: Housing; Industry-suggest industry location and capacity to serve the industries that the city seeks to attract; encourage growth yet balance quality of life

Develop housing gap analysis (demand generator)

Long Range Planning--Focus on Mobility Mobility planning needs to be part of the economic growth strategy to promote growth of property values and sales tax bases while serving the needs of the community in housing and services   Establish new, long-term focus on planning, agency coordination, scheduling and identification and securing funding opportunities through a transportation liaison in PD--PD to hire person
Long Range Planning--Focus on Drainage The city should have a dedicated focus on drainage and flooding with attention to the coordination of improvements with HCFCD and other agencies.  This should include the identification and securing of leveraged funding opportunities and develop an understanding of the requirements of the mandated storm water quality programs and their impacts on the drainage system.   Develop a policy with input from Planning Commission, PWE and private sector--topics to be included:
  • sub-regional detention
  • impervious cover
  • neighborhood drainage
  • funding sources
Long Range Planning--Comprehensive GIS Develop a geographic information system (GIS) that is coordinated with the data provided by others to identify quality of life and economic growth opportunities Mayor's Geo Spatial Committee is meeting to develop a seamless approach using common architecture.  Recently hired city GIS staff to assist with this effort--start date March 27 Utilize updated GIS to conduct gap analysis and identify and foster strategic growth.

Recognize that the GIS is a marketing and informational tool

Long Range Planning--Capital Improvement Plan The CIP is a manifestation of the strategic plan.  Its projects should largely serve the strategic goals.  The city should consider adopting a ten year view of the CIP with two components:
  • long range programmatic improvements (representing the bulk of the CIP) and
  • Shorter term responsiveness to citizen calls for action
Revisions to Super Neighborhood Program requires neighborhoods to identify short term CIP items Create 10 year CIP (5 years funded) based upon 10 year project plan
Urban Core--Transit Corridor Plans Issue: There are no rules or standards to respond to the needs of development along the transit corridors (setbacks, pedestrian access and parking) The Planning Commission considers parking and setback variances without any framework.
Urban Core--Transit Corridor Plans Planning Commission convene a working group composed of all stakeholders to develop a pilot plan by May 2006 centered on Main Street Corridor light rail stations with recommended rules reflecting the different corridor segments Transit Corridor Plan concept drafted Establishes working group to define scope of pilot plan, evaluate plan and develops implementation plan
Urban Core--Right of Way Dedication Issue: As development occurs, the PC is regularly asked to grant variances not to dedicate ROW on existing streets.  In many cases the pavement is very narrow, there is open ditch drainage and homes setback only 10' from the ROW.  The result is a patchwork of ROW dedication.
Urban Core--Right of Way Dedication Planning Commission should further define the street hierarchy classification system to include local streets

Analyzed performance standards for local streets in specific areas in terms of ROW and Paving 

  Reconvene subcommittee to define criteria for hierarchy and develop performance standards for specific areas

Move to Neighborhood Preservation

Urban Core--Additional Considerations Reconvene Urban Core to consider
  • Routine variances
  • Delineating recommendations that stimulate the development of affordable housing
  • remainder tracts
  • standards to stimulate pedestrian friendly development
  • Establish coordination practices with PWE
  • Encourage planning of green space
  • Establish flexible standards for central city commercial opportunities
  • Parking for infill development
  Planning Commission reconvenes subcommittee to work on routine variances.
Parking--Texas Medical Center Issue: Continued growth in the Medical Center area and the need for structured parking is straining capacity of the area's roadway system.  The combination of TMC's location along Main and Fannin Streets and the increasing development with in the Medical Center are resulting in daily gridlock on streets.
Parking--Texas Medical Center
  • Expand TMC parking management area (PMA) to include new properties and require traffic studies for proposed development location in congested areas
  • Establish a max. parking ration or ceiling for congested areas within the TMC PMA
  • Encourage partnerships with City, County, Metro to build remote structured parking facilities at strategic locations along Main Street light rail line
  PD parking management office and TMC establish new boundaries and amend PMA

PD parking management and TMC explore concept of parking rations or ceilings.  If feasible, proposed amendment to PMA to require ratios as requested by TMC

Parking--Decal Program Notification of decal parking application should be mailed to both owners and tenants of properties within 200 feet of the proposed decal parking area

Special events permits should be given to residents upon request

Contractor/builder permits should be made available

Ordinance amended 10/2005 to require notification

Special events permits are available to residents upon request

Permits are available upon request

All Completed

 

Parking--Guest Parking Issue: As density increase in urban and suburban areas, on-street and off-street guest parking becomes scarce.  This condition is often exacerbated when infrastructure in older neighborhoods is not adequate.  Chapter 42 does not require guest parking for residential infill.
Parking--Guest Parking
  • Establish incentives for providing guest parking
  • Encourage single entry driveways to preserve on-street parking
  • Encourage shared driveway entrances
  • Re-institute paving assessment program to replace open ditch with curb and gutter
  • Anticipate the need for neighborhood parking lots
  • Development impact subcommittee drafted concept to spread cost of infrastructure improvements

 

 
  • Establish working group to further consider guest parking
  • If consensus reached, PD presents proposal to PC
  • Amend Chap 42 to require quest parking for large scale development
Parking on Transit/Commercial Corridors Issue: Retail and mixed use projects proposed in the Main Street Corridor have requested reduced parking based on the proximity to light rail stations.  There is little data available to substantiate arguments in favor of granting variance for reduced parking.  There is concern that overflow parking will spill onto adjacent properties and the possibility of establishing a retail environment that is certain to fail.
Parking on Transit/Commercial Corridors PC should study establishing parking grids  based on need.  Some areas may have a ceiling and some areas may have alternative parking ratios   Public/Private partnerships to develop parking structures at strategic locations along rail

look at highly dense corridors with residential and commercial development

develop parking rations for development near LRT and BRT