July 13,
2005
Stakeholders Advisory
Committee
(Advising
the Houston City Council’s Flood Control & Drainage Committee)
Summary of
Discussions Concerning Funding for City of
Houston Drainage System Capital Programs
This summarizes discussions from a
July 13, 2005 meeting of the City’s Stakeholders Advisory
Committee (SAG) an advisory group to the City Council’s Flood Control &
Drainage chair, Ada Edwards and vice chair, Tony Lawrence.
The discussion
topic was a continuation of a previous meeting agenda, how to finance the
City’s flood control and drainage program. SAG will continue to discuss
financing and implementation at future meetings. I am unsure how or even
if these suggestions will be forwarded to Council.
Federal grants
A previously
assumed strategy for funding has been determined to be infeasible or not
promising because what federal funding is available is mostly allocated to
Harris County Flood Control. Gaining additional funding is not
politically practicable.
REGIONAL APPROACH
SAG discussed
the need to not penalize development in the City with significantly higher
impact fees. With the existing division of responsibilities between
counties in the area and between the City and
Harris County, a reorganization would very difficult and
likely politically infeasible.
The Urban
Stormwater Study currently being undertaken by
Harris County, City of Houston and TxDOT will not discuss
governance issues. Additionally, the Study does not now have a “how to
finance” component.
Dedicated fee & impact fee
SAG focused on
the need for dedicated revenue for drainage capital projects estimated to
be in the $2 billion range, the primary focus of which is listed below:
-
Revenue from
a dedicated (no transfer to general fund) drainage fee for capital
projects in the amount of $3.50 to 5.00 avg per month
-
Implementation of an impact fee on new development
-
No
exemptions from drainage fee
Implementing the fees
SAG discussed
how to implement this type of program:
-
Should first
have a comprehensive plan for drainage improvements with priority
projects and implementation schedule
-
Estimate the
funding requirements (The Urban Stormwater Study could help establish
some credibility in the size of the problem and its cost. If that plan
had a financial component which it does not now have, it could also
suggest the fees as alternatives, further providing credibility.
-
Gain a
supporter(s) on Council
A discussion
on a related issues ran throughout the meeting: a limitation of and the
need to change a City Charter requirement that City revenue be divided
50/50 between capital projects and maintenance and operations.